POST_START
Troubleshooting Column-Level Security with Function and Grant Inspection
I was working on a data pipeline where certain users needed access to specific columns in the customer data, but not all. I noticed that when I tried to query the email column, it wasn’t showing up in the results, even though the column existed in the table. I needed to understand why the email column wasn’t visible and how to resolve this issue. I decided to investigate the function and grants that might be affecting access to the email field.
DESCRIBE FUNCTION EXTENDED production.security.email_mask;
| col_name | data_type | comment |
|---|---|---|
| customer_id | bigint | customer identifier |
| customer_name | string | customer display name |
| region | string | sales region |
I ran the DESCRIBE FUNCTION EXTENDED command to see what the email_mask function was doing. The output showed that the function was taking in customer_id, customer_name, and region, but not the email. This made me think that the function might be masking the email column or that it wasn’t being applied correctly. I wanted to check if the function had the necessary permissions to be executed by the users who needed access.
SHOW GRANTS ON FUNCTION production.security.email_mask;
| principal | actionType | objectType |
|---|---|---|
| data_analysts | EXECUTE | FUNCTION |
| data_engineers | EXECUTE | FUNCTION |
I checked the grants on the email_mask function using SHOW GRANTS. The output showed that the function was granted to both data_analysts and data_engineers groups, which were the users I expected to have access. This suggested that the function was available, but I still couldn’t see the email column. I needed to dig deeper into the table structure to confirm what columns were actually being returned.
DESCRIBE TABLE EXTENDED production.customers.customer_master;
| col_name | data_type | comment |
|---|---|---|
| customer_id | bigint | customer identifier |
| customer_name | string | customer display name |
| region | string | sales region |
I ran , but not I executed a query to select the DESCRIBE TABLE EXTENDED on the customer_master table to confirm the columns it contained. The output listed customer_id, customer_name, and region
email. This made me realize that the email column might not be part of the table itself, or it might be masked by the function. I needed to test the query to see if the function was being applied correctly.SELECT customer_id, email FROM production.customers.customer_master;
customer_id
customer_name
region
status
1001
Maria Keller
EU
ACTIVE
1002
Daniel Smith
US
ACTIVE
1003
Sofia Rossi
EU
INACTIVE
customer_id and email columns, but the email column wasn't present in the results. This confirmed that the email wasn't being returned, which aligned with the function's description. I realized that the email_mask function might be masking the email column, or there could be a column-level security policy in place that was preventing access to the email field. I needed to ensure that the function was being applied correctly and that the users had the right permissions to access the masked data.


Leave a Reply